Written by the Treasureguide for the exclusive use of the Trasure Beaches Report.
![]() |
B. and C. Above Are Iron Objects from the Post-contact Period. |
Dated to roughly AD 1700–1750, the River Bend site captures a pivotal moment—just after Euro-American contact began altering Indigenous societies, but before those changes completely took root. What emerges is a portrait of Native ingenuity and identity, etched into shell beads, bone tools, and elk ivory pendants...
“We haven’t seen awls like this at other sites from the same period,” Pelton explains. “But they seem to be among the first types of metal tools to appear at early contact sites. They quickly replaced older technologies, which had been used for thousands of years.”
These utilitarian tools—along with metal knives, kettles, needles, and axes—offered tangible improvements in daily life. Their early adoption reflects the practical needs of the community, not just their openness to novelty. Tools that could be integrated into existing lifeways were the first to cross the cultural threshold.
At River Bend, the presence of metal awls likely helped artisans work more quickly and effectively, especially with abundant materials like shell. This small technological change had ripple effects, possibly increasing the production and distribution of adornment items, reinforcing social networks, and shaping identity practices...
Here is the link to the rest of that article.
Ancient Beads and Lost Stories Unearthed in a Wyoming Field
I've found an iron awl and some others that I'm more uncertain about.
---
The warrior’s grave contained a rich array of artifacts. Weapons included iron spears, a curved sword known as a machaira (Greek: Μάχαιρα), and a shield with an iron umbo. Jewelry finds featured a silver fibula, bracelet, and ring. Ceramic and glass vessels, some imported from Mediterranean centers, suggest far-reaching trade connections.
The find was made during rescue excavations along the planned route of a cable connection between Topolovgrad and a nearby solar park.
Experts describe it as a masterpiece of ancient sculpture and a rare example of high-class Hellenistic art. Animal figures, likely representing beasts vanquished by Heracles, adorned the cheekpieces.
Here is the link for more of that story.
Hellenistic Era Warrior Tomb and Sanctuary Unearthed in Bulgaria - GreekReporter.com
Horse tack and related objects have been found on the Treasure Coast - probaby more than we realize. Some are correctly identified, while others probably remain mystery objects.
I had one mystery find that for a long time remained a mystery to me. I now think it was one of these.
Here is the former mystery item.
And here is what I now think it is. I'm talking about the object in the middle of the harness.
Here is the link to the post on horse tack.
---
AI can be helpful and save a lot of research time for detectorists and treasure hunters, but there are some things you need to know about the accuracy and reliability of AI systems like Copilot, ChatGPT and Grok.
If you were on the Treasure Coast Tuesday evening, you probably heard a sonic boom around maybe 10:30 PM. I thought it was a sonic boom but checked this morning. I asked copilot and copilot said there was a sonic boom due to a SpaceX launch. Copilot also mentioned sonic boom alerts being online, and I asked where I could find those "sonic boom alerts." Copilot gave an answer that was somewhat lacking. It sounded good. It mentioned some TV stations, for example, and said to check the SpaceX feed on Twitter.
Unable to find record of any SpaceX launch Tuesday evening after checking some of the listed sources, my wife, using her own computer, also queried Copilot, using nearly the same wording I used. Copilot told her the boom was from a ULA launch. ULA is United Launch Alliance, a Boeing/Lockheed project. Nothing about SpaceX this time. The biggest difference between her query and mine, was she asked about Fort Pierce and I asked about St. Lucie. I don't think that would account for the different Copilot responses - one talking about a SpaceX launch and the other about a ULA launch.
My wife checked and did find evidence of a ULA launch that accounted for the boom. The point of all that being that while the AI systems can be helpful, they are not always correct, and they are sometimes inconsistent or unreliable. Small differences in wording of the query can apparently result in distinctly different respons
As I've said before, I've been doing an informal evaluation and comparison of those three AI systems. At this point I would give Copilot, which I've used the most, no more than an 80% or a grade of B. When it comes to leading edge or more challenging issues, probably B-. For example, it knew nothing of the Claytom metalphone listed in the old New York Times article.
When it comes to metal detecting, I often feel that I am spending too much time training the AI system. These systems are not innovators. They scan what is already out there and give weight to the most highly regarded or "authoritative" sources. I asked either Copilot of ChatGPT for the criteria used to determine "authoritativeness." Of course it cited things like reputation, respected institutions and stuff like that. All of that is backwards looking.
If you check the sources provided by Copilot, and I assume the others too, you'll sometimes find that the information is sometimes actually not in the source referenced. Upon pointing that to Copilot, that the information provided was not in the source it provided, it something like, "You are exactly right." It then goes on to explain that from the available information that it (Copilot) somewhow derived the conclusion.
Musk and others seem proud to say that Grok4 scores better than Harvard professors, or something like that. That is ok if you want to find out what the most accepted thinking is among those recognized as authorities, but I wouldn't ask those same people for advice on things like relationships, spiritual life, or many other practical issues of daily living. And certainly not metal detecting.
I got long winded there, but my point is that you can not assume an answer given by an AI system is correct. As I've said, I've found AI very useful. It can save a lot of time. But it is far from perfect.
---
![]() |
Source: nhc.noaa.gov. |
It looks like we'll have south winds for a few days, but after that we'll get some north winds.
The view using the ECMWF track shows Erin's projected postiion for about a week from now.
![]() |
Windy.com. |
According to the ECMWF model, Erin will stay out to sea.
Here is the surf chart from SurfGuru.com.
![]() |
Source: SurfGuru.com. |
So it doesn't look like Erin will cause any increase in surf until next week.
Good hunting,
Treasureguide@comcast.net