Written by the TreasureGuide for the exclusive use of the Treasure Beaches Report.
![]() |
Mystery Object Found on Treasure Coast by Vance D. |
Vance D. sent the above photo along with the following message.
Not sure what it is I was wondering what I could soak this in to de-rust it to better identify it without destroying it if it's something important
Thanks Vance.
Of course it is impossible to tell what it is from a photo without any measurements or other information. If there is nothing in a photo to suggest the size measurements would be helpful.
But from what I can see, the shape looks like a strap hinge (see below) to me, and maybe a bolt on top.
My preferred procedure would be to first soak it in distilled water to leech out the salts (do that with any suspected encrusted iron object) then mechanically remove as much of the surface rust as possible. After getting a better feel for how solid the item is under the crust, perhaps try electrolysis or a rust remover.
Here is a previous post on electrolysis. It provides a number of additional links.
And here is a link to some posts on EOs.
Any reader guesses on the object or recommendations on cleaning?
---
I recently mentioned in one post that metal detector conductivity numbers are not sufficient alone to identify the metallic composition of a buried target flawlessly. An old test I conducted showed a very large range of numbers in response to a variety of gold targets. In the past, I've posted a number of tests that I conducted to determine the metallic composition of differenti kinds of targets. Today I wanted to look at a couple of those tests to show some of the factors that can affect a metal detector's conductivity number reading.
The first test that I'll mention involved large coins, including a gold American Eagle coin, a 1922 Peace dollar and a 1971 clad Kennedy half. The American Eagle coin is 91.67% gold, 3% silver, with the remainder being copper with a reeded edge. It is 1.287 inches (32.70 mm) in diameter, so in diameter the gold coin is a little smaller than the Peace dollar but bigger than the clad Kennedy half.The Equinox 600 produced conductivity numbers mostly in the range of 32 -34 on the Kennedy Half, and 37 - 38 on the Peace dollar, which was consistent with the numbers produced by these coins in other tests. The American Eagle gold coin produced numbers that centered on 26 - 28. The conductivity numbers are more consistent when the detection depth when the depth was moderate.
When the coil was close enough to the coins, the conductivity numbers obtained on these three coins were different enough and consistent enough to reliably discriminate between the three coins used in the test. .
In that test with large round coins laying flat, the Equinox conductivity numbers very well reflected the conductivity of the metallic composition of the coins. Silver has a higher conductivity than copper by a small amount, and gold is lower than silver and gold and the conductivity numbers obtained in the experiment reflected that very well.
Here is the link for more detail.
So it would appear that under certain circumstances the metallic composition of objects can be consistently identified by metal detector conductivity ratings. However, there is more to the matter.
In another experiment I used Spanish reales of different sizes, and different shapes. Although there could be differences in the amount of alloys in these coins, I assumed that they were pretty similar.
![]() |
Source: SurfGuru.com. |