Written by the TreasureGuide for the exclusive use of the Treasure Beaches Report.
| Quarter Showing Strike-through Error. |
The first of five newly designed quarters to celebrate the USA’s 250th anniversary, this coin features a Pilgrim couple facing West on the front, or obverse. The Mayflower ship, on which early English settlers journeyed in search of religious freedom, is the design featured on the back (reverse).
Known as a “struck-through,” the newly discovered error occurred on the obverse of the Mayflower Compact quarter. It appears as an incuse impression between God and we in the motto in God we trust and between the dual dates of 1776 and 2026...
The error, which you can see in the photo above, was likely caused by a piece of debris stuck to the die.
Here is the link for the rest of the article.
2026 Mayflower Compact Quarter Features Unexpected Error - Numismatic News
Here is the most obvious of several strike-through error coins I've found
---
A three-year-old picked up one stone that caught her attention of the thousands of stones in the surroundings. It was later identified as a 3800-year-old scarab amulet.
Here is the link for the story about that.
Toddler Discovers 3,800-Year-Old Egyptian Amulet While Hiking With Her Family in Israel
You'll might see other stories about the same event, such as the MSN one, that shows a totally different scarab stone in the lead photo. They do that all the time, and I've complained about it before.
In the past, I sometimes didn't realize their photos were just selected to grab attention and didn't really show the subject of the article. I was probably fooled a number of times. Now I know that their photos are often very inaccurate and misleading. The description under the photo will often be very vague and provide a hint that the photo has nothing to do with the actual story.
---
I just discovered an interesting web site. I found it when searching for pictures of Spanish Colonial artifacts. The site does have a lot of pictures of artifacts, but it also a presents archaeological articles related to Spanish colonial finds in the Southern U.S. It author of the site is an archaeologithest who shares many of the ideas concerning archaeology that I've expressed in the Treasure Beaches Report.
You may not remember my posts criticizing archaeology, including their attitude towards treasure hunting and the public in general. From what I've seen so far, the author of the site shares many of my thoughts and values on the topic.
Here is a link to one old post in which I expressed some of my criticisms and suggestions.
Since I started expressed those thoughts, I've have noticed some positive trends. I can only hope I had some small effect on that.
Archaeology now sometimes uses metal detectors and even employs metal detecting clubs to survey some sites. There was a time when there were very few that would admit the value of using metal detectors at all. Treasure hunters and detectorists were described as looters and the value of metal detector surveys was not generally admitted.
The site I just discovered is "Archaeology Ink" which presents many articles written by, Caleb Curren, an archaeologist who focuses on Spanish Colonial sites in the Southern U.S. Here is a link to the articles.
Archeology Ink | Assorted Articles - A Research Journal by Caleb Curren, Archeologist
One central focus of the author seems to be the site of the Tristan de Luna sites, claimed to be a 1559 Spanish colony. Here are some excerpts from one of the author's articles on that topic.
There is a dictate upon universities that mandates a practice of transparency of their data within a reasonable time frame. In the nine years that have transpired since the UWF “Remarkable Claim” there has not been a technical report made available to archeologists and the public. That is not a reasonable time frame...
UWF has had numerous articles published by various public media outlets. They have also given numerous papers at professional conferences. That is not the same as a technical report being released to the public in standardized formats providing details of their excavations. For some reason UWF has aggressively avoided publishing such a document. If they did, it would allow the academic community to critique the interpretations of their data.
Public universities in the State of Florida, including UWF, receive state and federal funding. Therefore, they are subject to state and federal laws which require full disclosure of their data. In other words, universities are subject to a legitimate expectation of transparency in the workings of those institutions...
Here is the link for the rest of that article.
And here is the link to the Spanish Colonial artifacts section. It isn't the most exhaustive list of artifacts, but it is worth browsing.
Archeology Ink | Spanish Artifacts - A Research Journal by Caleb Curren, Archeologist
I share the sentiments of at least this professional archaeologist and those presented by his web site. They are consistent with the thoughts I've presented in this blog over the years. I recommend at least browsing Archaeology Ink. It presents more articles that you might find helpful.
By the way, some of this blog's readers have found that some of the UWF archaeologists have been helpful. I suppose some are better than others.
---
Look at that. Nothing stirring. Not even a mouse.
| Source: nhc.noaa.gov |